This website uses cookies.
Office of the Election Supervisor for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

              July 31, 1996

 

 

VIA UPS OVERNIGHT

 


James P. Hoffa

July 31, 1996

Page 1

 

 

James P. Hoffa

2593 Hounds Chase

Troy, MI 48098

 

Ron Carey, General President

International Brotherhood of Teamsters

25 Louisiana Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20001


Bradley T. Raymond

Finkel, Whitefield, Selik, Raymond

  Ferrara & Feldman

32300 Northwestern Highway, Suite 200

Farmington Hills, MI 48334


James P. Hoffa

July 31, 1996

Page 1

 

 

Re:  Election Office Case No. P-843-IBT-NYC

 

Gentlemen:

 

A pre-election protest was filed pursuant to Article XIV, Section 2(b) of the Rules for the IBT International Union Delegate and Officer Election (Rules) by James P. Hoffa, a candidate for general president.  Mr. Hoffa alleges that IBT International Organizer

Mike Curcio used union resources to campaign, in violation of the Rules.  Specifically,

Mr. Hoffa contends that on June 19, 1996, Mr. Curcio contacted delegate Joe Traver while the latter was at work and engaged him in a discussion concerning the delegate pledge in support of Ron Carey.  According to Mr. Hoffa, Mr. Curcio then used a union fax machine to transmit a copy of the pledge to Mr. Traver.

 

The IBT denies the allegations and contends that the protest is untimely.

 

New York City Protest Coordinator Barbara C. Deinhardt investigated the protest.

 

These allegations were first brought to the attention of the Election Officer on July 4, 1996 when the protester sought to add them to a protest filed earlier.  Ms. Deinhardt advised the protester that, as the new allegations arose from a substantially separate nexus of fact, they should be filed as a new protest.  On July 9, 1996, the protester filed the current protest.  He states that he became aware of the facts alleged on July 3, 1996.


James P. Hoffa

July 31, 1996

Page 1

 

 

Article XIV, Section 2(b) of the Rules requires protesters to file within two (2) working days of the day when the protestor becomes aware or reasonably should have become aware of the action protested.  The short time limits are important to ensuring that alleged violations of the Rules are quickly brought to the attention of the Election Officer in order to afford the greatest opportunity for applying an effective remedy if a violation is found.

 

The protester argues that his protest should be considered filed on July 4, 1996 because that was the day he first brought the allegations to the attention of an Election Office representative.  Accepting this argument, it remains true that 10 working days elapsed between the alleged incident and the filing of the protest.  Such a delay would not bar an analysis of the protest on its merits only if the protester could not reasonably have acquired the information upon which the protest was based until a time inside the limitation assigned by the Rules.

 

The investigation revealed, however, that Terry Majka, a candidate for International vice president, informed Mr. Hoffa of the events protested here by telephone on June 20 or June 21, 1996.  This evidence indicates that Mr. Hoffa had actual knowledge of the alleged facts upon which he based this protest at least eight working days prior to his conversation with the Election Office representative.  Such a delay is unreasonable under the Rules and

Mr. Hoffas protest is untimely as a result.

 

Accordingly, the protest is DENIED.

 

Any interested party not satisfied with this determination may request a hearing before the Election Appeals Master within one day of receipt of this letter.  The parties are reminded that, absent extraordinary circumstances, no party may rely upon evidence that was not presented to the Office of the Election Officer in any such appeal.  Requests for a hearing shall be made in writing and shall be served on:

 

Kenneth Conboy, Esq.

Latham & Watkins

885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000

New York, NY 10022

Fax (212) 751-4864

 


James P. Hoffa

July 31, 1996

Page 1

 

 

Copies of the request for hearing must be served on the parties listed above as well as upon the Election Officer, 400 N. Capitol Street, Suite 855, Washington, D.C. 20001, Facsimile (202) 624-3525.  A copy of the protest must accompany the request for a hearing.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

 

Barbara Zack Quindel

Election Officer

 

cc:               Kenneth Conboy, Election Appeals Master

Barbara C. Deinhardt, New York City Protest Coordinator